Shehbaz sharif remarks on cypher case

The High Court judges on Thursday protested the comments made by State leader Shehbaz Sharif, marking some among the appointed authorities as 'black sheep', saying the nation's top chief authority ought to thump the entryways of the significant gatherings in the event that he had grumblings. The comments from the appointed authorities came as the top court took up the very first intra-court requests (ICAs) against Sept 15 larger part judgment proclaimed corrections to the Public Responsibility Mandate (NAO) as unlawful. The appointed authorities were alluding to a location of the state leader at an occasion coordinated regarding the May 28 festivals in which he was accounted for as saying: " You come from Pakistan; you are judges. On the off chance that improvement doesn't get back to Pakistan, then there will be no appointed authorities, no lawmakers, and no other person. Do you need this? I accept that the vast majority of these appointed authorities are Pakistanis and ponder Pakistan's turn of events, yet some 'black sheep' are helping [PTI founder] Imran Khan." Drawing a lined up between court procedures when PML-N President Nawaz Sharif was confronting a crowd of bodies of evidence and preliminaries against PTI organizer Imran Khan, the top state leader said when his senior sibling was under preliminary, he wouldn't get bail in his cases, and added that we had been educated regarding conversations in the legal executive about how the PTI pioneer could be rescued and his cases excused. The bigger seat headed by Boss Equity of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and involving Equity Amin-ud-Noise Khan, Equity Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Equity Athar Minallah and Equity Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi took up two ICAs — one documented by the central government and the other by previous SSGCL overseeing chief Zuhair Ahmed Siddiqui. On Thursday, the justices of the Supreme Court objected to remarks made by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in which he described some of the judges as "black sheep" and suggested that the country's top executive official should approach relevant forums with complaints. The comments from the adjudicators came as the top court took up the very first intra-court requests (ICAs) against Sept 15 greater part judgment announced changes to the Public Responsibility Law (NAO) as unlawful. The judges were referring to a speech that the prime minister gave at an event that was held in conjunction with the celebrations on May 28 and in which he was said to have said: You are Pakistanis; you are judges. In the event that improvement doesn't get back to Pakistan, then, at that point, there will be no appointed authorities, no legislators, and no other person. Do you need this? Although some "black sheep" are assisting PTI founder Imran Khan, I believe that the majority of these judges are Pakistanis who are concerned about Pakistan's development. Drawing a lined up between court procedures when PML-N President Nawaz Sharif was confronting a crowd of bodies of evidence and preliminaries against PTI organizer Imran Khan, the top state leader said when his senior sibling was under preliminary, he wouldn't get bail in his cases, and added that we had been educated regarding conversations in the legal executive about how the PTI pioneer could be rescued and his cases excused. Two ICAs, one filed by the federal government and the other by former SSGCL managing director Zuhair Ahmed Siddiqui, were heard by the larger bench, which was headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and included Justices Amin-ud-Din Khan, Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Athar Minallah, and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Imran Khan Toshakhana case

Image
The Imran Khan Toshakhana Case A Landmark in Political Accountability  The political landscape of Pakistan has been dominated by numerous high-profile cases, but none has captured the public's imagination quite like the Imran Khan Toshakhana case. This landmark case represents a significant moment in the country's history, reflecting both the complexities of political accountability and the public's demand for transparency in leadership.     Understanding the Toshakhana  To fully appreciate the significance of this case, it's essential to understand what Toshakhana is. Derived from Persian, meaning "treasure house," Toshakhana refers to the official repository where gifts received by officials and dignitaries of the state are stored. These gifts, often luxurious and highly valuable, are meant to be cataloged and declared, ensuring they remain the property of the state unless purchased by the recipient under specific guidelines.    The Case Against Imran
Read more

Islamabad high court statement about Child marriage

Image
 Islamabad High Court's Landmark Judgement: A Monumental Step Against Child Marriage In a historic and commendable move, the Islamabad High Court has delivered a landmark judgment that reaffirms the protection of children's rights and sets a powerful precedent against the practice of child marriage. This judgment is not just a victory for legal reform but a significant leap towards ensuring the well-being and future of countless young girls and boys in Pakistan. The Judgement: A Detailed Insight The Islamabad High Court has ruled unequivocally that any marriage involving children under the age of 18 is illegal and unconstitutional. This ruling aligns with international conventions and the constitutional rights of children, reinforcing Pakistan's commitment to safeguarding its young citizens from the perils of early marriage. The court emphasized that child marriage violates fundamental human rights, impedes education, and subjects minors to a lifetime of physical and e
Read more

Deputy Commissioner Irfan Nawaz Memon case

Image
Deputy Commissioner Irfan Nawaz Memon's Contempt of Court Case   In a riveting turn of events, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has handed down a landmark decision, sentencing Deputy Commissioner Irfan Nawaz Memon to six months in prison for contempt of court!  This dramatic verdict arises from the unauthorized detention of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders Shehryar Afridi and Shandana Gulzar under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance.  This case, bursting with political intrigue and legal drama, reached its zenith as Justice Babar Sattar delivered a powerful judgment, highlighting the sanctity of judicial orders and the consequences of defiance.   Alongside Memon, Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Jameel Zafar and Station House Officer (SHO) Naseer Manzoor received sentences of four and two months, respectively, and were each fined Rs100,000, underscoring the court's stern stance against violations of legal protocol.   The court's decision to suspend M
Read more